Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/umputun/cc-thingzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/umputun/cc-thingz/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/umputun/cc-thingz/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/umputun/cc-thingz/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/umputun/cc-thingz/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/umputun/cc-thingz/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "review",
"description": "PR review, interactive git diff annotation review, and writing style guide",
"version": "2.2.4",
"author": {
"name": "Umputun"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/umputun/cc-thingz",
"repository": "https://github.com/umputun/cc-thingz",
"license": "MIT"
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 3 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 157 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 12 lines scan A 9cf304c26705
review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository umputun/cc-thingz (486 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
han-github
Github specific extensions to the Han plugin for agentic planning and coding. Provides skills to post code reviews as PR comments, update a PR description with a consistent format, etc.
gerrit
An MCP server for interacting with the Gerrit code review system.
odin-git
ODIN workflows for commits, branches, pull requests, review feedback, and issue tracking.
open-pr
Pre-flight checks and PR creation workflow: run tests, open a PR, code review, and check CI.
fullstack-dev-kit
Issue-to-PR workflow kit for any tech stack. Fetch a user story from your tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, Azure DevOps) and any linked Figma designs, implement with plan approval, enforce >95% coverage and a security pass, generate e2e tests, open the PR, fix review findings, and move the ticket to review.
ci-review
CI-optimized code review: multi-agent parallel review with confidence scoring and atomic GitHub PR review posting via gh api.