Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vidhunnan/agentic-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vidhunnan/agentic-skills/design-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vidhunnan/agentic-skills/design-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/vidhunnan/agentic-skills/design-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vidhunnan/agentic-skills/design-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/vidhunnan/agentic-skills/design-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
design-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "design-critique",
"description": "Reviews a built interface against its stated design intent — naming how the thing reads before proposing a fix, ranking findings by severity, and treating removal as a first-class verdict. Refuses to critique without a written intent.",
"version": "0.1.0",
"author": {
"name": "Vidhunnan Murugan"
}
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 124 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 9 lines scan A a14ed7b7154c
design-critique is a plugin published in the GitHub repository vidhunnan/agentic-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
design-critique compared with plugins from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| design-critiquevidhunnan/agentic-skills | Plugin | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | — | Claude Code |
| aio-visual-diffaiocean/claude-plugins | Plugin | 4 | 10d ago | MIT | A | — | Claude Code |
| motion-design-skillsiart-ai/motion-design-skills | Plugin | 203 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | — | Claude Code |
| ui-input-skillsancoleman/ai-design-components | Plugin | 527 | 11mo ago | MIT | A | — | Claude Code |
| hyperstackorkait/hyperstack | Plugin | 1 | 1mo ago | none | A | — | Claude Code |
| stark-figma-driveangelostark/stark-figma-drive-mcp | Plugin | 0 | 7mo ago | none | A | — | Claude Code |
| humanizerblader/humanizer | Plugin | 66k | 10d ago | MIT | A | — | Claude Code |