Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vintasoftware/django-ai-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vintasoftware/django-ai-plugins/django-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vintasoftware/django-ai-plugins/django-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/vintasoftware/django-ai-plugins/django-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vintasoftware/django-ai-plugins/django-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/vintasoftware/django-ai-plugins/django-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
django-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill, 1 agent travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 111 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines scan A 963e0b667ddf
django-reviewer is a plugin published in the GitHub repository vintasoftware/django-ai-plugins (157 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
python-dev
Python development workflow with architecture design, coding guidelines, testing patterns, and specialized review agents.
claude-everything marketplace
Skills for Python/FastAPI development and git workflows.
fastapi-coding-conventions
Coding conventions for Python/FastAPI projects with SQLAlchemy, Pydantic v2, and layered architecture.
advanced-code-quality
Advanced Python code quality gates beyond basic linting. Covers cognitive complexity (complexipy), code duplication (jscpd), architectural enforcement (import-linter), dependency hygiene (deptry), test quality gates (diff-cover, mutmut), docstring coverage (interrogate), and AI-generated code detection (sloppylint).…
python-quality-hooks
PostToolUse hooks for Python files. On Edit: ruff bugs-only check + mypy. On Write: ruff isort fix + ruff format, then the same checks. Non-blocking — feedback only.
humanizer
Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says.