Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vivekkachhadiyatech/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vivekkachhadiyatech/skills/prototyping-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vivekkachhadiyatech/skills/prototyping-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/vivekkachhadiyatech/skills/prototyping-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/vivekkachhadiyatech/skills/prototyping-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/vivekkachhadiyatech/skills/prototyping-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
prototyping-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "prototyping-testing",
"version": "0.1.0",
"description": "Fidelity ladder for prototyping + Nielsen-10 heuristic evaluation (0–4 severity) + browser QA via Lighthouse. Contrast/a11y delegated to quality-gate; nothing self-attests.",
"author": { "name": "Pranav Dalal", "email": "[email protected]" },
"keywords": ["design", "prototyping", "usability", "heuristics", "testing", "qa"],
"license": "MIT",
"dependencies": ["quality-gate"]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 3 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 153 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 10 lines scan A c2f118a4375d
prototyping-testing is a plugin published in the GitHub repository vivekkachhadiyatech/skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
accessibility-compliance
WCAG accessibility auditing, compliance validation, UI testing for screen readers, keyboard navigation, and inclusive design.
design-compare
Compare Figma designs against implementation screenshots with interactive HTML reports.
designer
UI design validation. Compares a rendered screen against its reference by pixel diff, then reviews the result for spacing, hierarchy and design-system consistency.
a11y-audit
Full accessibility audit with WCAG compliance checking.
dotnet-coverage-kit
Characterization-test backfill and spec-test enforcement for .NET services. Deterministic C0/C1 measurement via dotnet-coverage, with a checked-in manifest that explains every inclusion and exclusion.
be-my-witness
Validate a UI screenshot against what a test expected and against a design mock, returning a pass/fail gate plus severity-ranked findings. Runs a deterministic pre-scan first (is this evidence, did the surface settle, are the two framings even comparable), crops and zooms rather than judging a full-page thumbnail…