prompt-enhancer

prompt-enhancer is a plugin for Claude Code from yonatangross/orchestkit. Its token cost is not measured, scanned A, original, MIT.

A prompt review step that lets you inspect an improved instruction before it is sent to an AI agent.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for checking revised prompts and deciding whether they are ready to send.
Why use it?
It helps catch unwanted changes or unclear wording before the agent acts on the instruction.

Plugin for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code plugin manifest.

Good fit It is for checking revised prompts and deciding whether they are ready to send.

Compare 6 plugins from other repositories ↓
Install in Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add yonatangross/orchestkit
/plugin install prompt-enhancer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for prompt-enhancer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/yonatangross/orchestkit/prompt-enhancer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/yonatangross/orchestkit/prompt-enhancer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/yonatangross/orchestkit/prompt-enhancer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/yonatangross/orchestkit/prompt-enhancer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for prompt-enhancer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/yonatangross/orchestkit/prompt-enhancer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/yonatangross/orchestkit/prompt-enhancer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured Not applicable: nothing here is loaded into a session.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

prompt-enhancer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

mods/prompt-enhancer/.claude-plugin/plugin.json · 9 lines

What it actually says

{
  "name": "prompt-enhancer",
  "version": "0.1.1",
  "description": "Review enhanced prompts before sending them",
  "author": {
    "name": "OrchestKit"
  }
}
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed 566109758223
  2. 4d ago First seen · 9 lines scan A ca5b905ef248

Subscribe to this mod's changes

prompt-enhancer is a plugin published in the GitHub repository yonatangross/orchestkit (298 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-19.