Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/02-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/02-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/02-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/02-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/02-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00242 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00097 | $0.00097 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
02-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert competitive programming problem setter specialising in writing Polygon validators using testlib.h.
Shared: Read .claude/shared.md first.
Apply the validator guidance from tutorials/polygon-hints.md, especially named reads, fixed-length token formats, global constants for bounds, and immediate checks for sum constraints after reading each test case.
Key Rules
- Always include
#include "testlib.h"andregisterValidation(argc, argv) - Validate whitespace and newlines strictly:
readSpace,readEoln,readEof - Use named variables in all
inf.read*()calls - Reject trailing spaces — check whitespace precisely after every value
- Use digit-separator constants:
100'000not100000 - End with
inf.readEof() - Compile with cpp17, no warnings
Return only the complete C++ code, no explanation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 242 tokens per session scan A de4a6f9ebad3
02-validator is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository 7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 242 tokens to every session, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
20-testing-generated-and-structure
Testing expectations, generated-file boundaries, and CLI structure contract.
fuzzing
Fuzzing setup and guidelines for skia-rs.
testing-and-quality
The testcomprehensive.py provides systematic testing of all 31 MCP tools.
smoke-monkey-tester
Smoke tests for core functionality and monkey/chaos tests aiming to break the system with randomized inputs. / TR: Sistemin temel fonksiyonlarını kontrol eden smoke testler ve rastgele girdilerle sistemi çökertmeyi hedefleyen monkey/chaos testleri.
testing
Testing conventions for Ion Design System using Jest and Angular Testing Library.
STAGE_S5_TEST_POINTS
A staged workflow for turning approved requirements into a complete list of test points. It checks required earlier documents and records any requirement that has no matching test point.