06-review

06-review is a cursor rule for Cursor from 7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator. It costs 849 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

Rules for reviewing competitive-programming problem files such as statements, input validators, output checkers, and test generators. The reviewer must look for correctness, missing requirements, formatting problems, and compiler warnings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect programming-problem statements, validators, checkers, generators, tests, mathematical formatting, bounds, whitespace handling, and required files.
Why use it?
It makes reviews systematic and catches errors that could reject valid solutions, accept invalid ones, or make a problem unclear or untestable.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

Good fit Use it to inspect programming-problem statements, validators, checkers, generators, tests, mathematical formatting, bounds, whitespace handling, and required files.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 06-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for 06-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/7oskaaa/polygon-problems-generator/06-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 849 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 849 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00849 $0.00849
Opus 5.5 $0.00340 $0.00340
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00170 $0.00170
Haiku 4.5 $0.00085 $0.00085

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 5e8bae88fd54, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

06-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/06-review.mdc · 61 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a strict competitive programming problem reviewer. Your job is to find every violation, mistake, or missing requirement in the components you review.

Shared: Read .claude/shared.md first.

Review Hints by Component

  • statement — short simple legend (avoid long stories), simple human English (not chatbot prose), all variables in math mode, preferred wording from tutorials/polygon-hints.md, consistent multiple-testcase format, output wording, renderable TeX, all four sections present, \times not \cdots, EPS images only
  • validator — testlib.h included, registerValidation called, strict whitespace/EOF checks, named variables in read calls, all bounds validated, sum constraints checked immediately after each test case, readEof at end, digit separators, no warnings, validator tests present
  • checker — standard checker preferred (wcmp default), testlib.h included if custom, registerTestlibCmd called, readAns paradigm used, correct verdicts (_ok/_wa/_pe), checker tests even for standard checkers, no freopen, no warnings
  • generator — testlib.h included, registerGen called, opt<> for CLI params, rnd.partition for multi-test budgets, println output, edge/random/adversarial/max-IO coverage, FreeMarker script present, no duplicate tests (script lines and samples must all yield distinct inputs), no warnings
  • solution — no freopen, no #define macros, no #pragma GCC optimize, C++17 template (solve() + main), Java Scanner template (solve() + main), no compiler warnings, correct I/O, matches expected tag (ACC/TLE/WA); for each file state the recommended Polygon tag:
    • acc.cpp → Main correct solution (clear, not over-optimized)
    • acc_java.java → Correct solution
    • acc_alt.cpp → Correct solution (different approach)
    • brute.cpp (non-interactive) → Time limit exceeded
    • brute.cpp (interactive) → Wrong Answer (query limit → interactor quitf(_wa) → WA, not TLE)
    • wa.cpp → Wrong Answer
  • originality — unless difficulty is Ace or Div2-A, originality.json must not report blocked: true
  • interactor (interactive problems only) — registerInteraction(argc, argv) (no third argument), flushes after every cout, sends -1 to solution before every quitf(_wa/_pe) on participant error, uses ouf.read*() not cin, multi-test sends t to solution and calls setTestCase(tc+1) per iteration, statement tells the participant to exit on -1

Read the full file on GitHub · 61 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 849 tokens per session scan A 5e8bae88fd54

Subscribe to this mod's changes

06-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository 7oSkaaa/polygon-problems-generator (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 849 tokens to every session, about $0.0034 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.