Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/8090-inc/software-factory-plugin/evaluation-protocolgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/8090-inc/software-factory-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00174 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00087 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
evaluation-protocol scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to evaluation-protocol — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Evaluation Protocol
Pass/Fail Criteria
- Define pass/fail criteria for each test case BEFORE executing any test runs
- Pass criteria should be based on semantic equivalence, not exact string matching
- A test passes if the output achieves the same goal as the expected outcome
Blind Testing
- Never expose expected outcomes to test-subject agents
- Test subjects receive ONLY the skill content and input
- Any accidental leakage invalidates the test run
Reporting
- Report results per-tier in a structured table format
- Include failure analysis with root cause and specific recommendations
- Order recommendations by expected impact (highest first)
- The refinement report is the primary deliverable — it must be actionable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 28 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 583c8200ee22
evaluation-protocol is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository 8090-inc/software-factory-plugin (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 174 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to evaluation-protocol, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
typescript
Changes to these high-fan-out internals can affect every message, delta, element, or rerun. Keep work in them minimal, and benchmark changes with representative stress-test apps.
coolify-ai-docs
Master reference to all Coolify AI documentation in .ai/ directory.
python_lib
Tips and guidelines specific to the development of the Streamlit Python library, not applicable to scripts and e2e tests.
specs
This directory contains product and tech specs for Streamlit features.