Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abderrahimghazali/cursor-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/abderrahimghazali/cursor-rules/python-insecure-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/abderrahimghazali/cursor-rules/python-insecure-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/abderrahimghazali/cursor-rules/python-insecure-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/abderrahimghazali/cursor-rules/python-insecure-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/abderrahimghazali/cursor-rules/python-insecure-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02425 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00970 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00485 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00243 |
Grade A, and why
python-insecure-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to python-insecure-design — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Python Insecure Design Security Standards (OWASP A04:2021)
This rule enforces security best practices to prevent insecure design vulnerabilities in Python applications, as defined in OWASP Top 10:2021-A04.
actions:
-
type: enforce conditions:
Pattern 1: Lack of input validation
- pattern: "def\s+[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\([^)]\):\s(?![^#]*validate|[^#]*clean|[^#]*sanitize|[^#]*check|[^#]*is_valid)" message: "Function lacks input validation. Consider implementing validation for all user-supplied inputs."
Pattern 2: Hardcoded business rules
- pattern: "if\s+[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\s*(==|!=|>|<|>=|<=)\s*['"][^'"]+['"]:" message: "Hardcoded business rules detected. Consider using configuration files or database-driven rules for better maintainability."
Pattern 3: Lack of rate limiting
- pattern: "@(app|api|route|blueprint)\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)\([^)]\)\s\n\s*(?![^#]*rate_limit|[^#]*throttle|[^#]*limiter)" message: "API endpoint lacks rate limiting. Consider implementing rate limiting to prevent abuse."
Pattern 4: Insecure default configurations
- pattern: "DEBUG\s*=\sTrue|DEVELOPMENT\s=\sTrue|TESTING\s=\s*True" message: "Insecure default configuration detected. Ensure debug/development modes are disabled in production."
Pattern 5: Lack of error handling
- pattern: "(?<!try:\s*\n)[^#]\n\s(?!except|finally)" message: "Consider implementing proper error handling with try-except blocks for operations that might fail."
Pattern 6: Insecure direct object references
- pattern: "get_object_or_404\(\s*[^,]+,\spk\s=\srequest\.(GET|POST|args|form|json)\[['"][^'"]+['"]\]\s\)|get\(\sid\s=\s*request\.(GET|POST|args|form|json)" message: "Potential insecure direct object reference. Validate user's permission to access the requested object."
Pattern 7: Missing authentication checks
- pattern: "@(app|api|route|blueprint)\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)\([^)]\)\s\n\s*(?!.@login_required|.@auth\.login_required|.*@jwt_required|.*current_user|.*request\.user)" message: "Endpoint lacks authentication checks. Consider adding authentication requirements for sensitive operations."
Pattern 8: Lack of proper logging
- pattern: "except\s+[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\s*(?:as\s+[a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?:\s*(?!.*logger\.|.*logging\.|.*print)" message: "Exception caught without proper logging. Implement proper logging for exceptions to aid in debugging and monitoring."
Pattern 9: Insecure file uploads
- pattern: "request\.files\[['"][^'"]+['"]\]|FileField\(|FileStorage\(" message: "File upload functionality detected. Ensure proper validation of file types, sizes, and implement virus scanning if applicable."
Pattern 10: Lack of security headers
- pattern: "response\.(headers|set_header)\([^)]\)|return\s+Response\([^)]\)|return\s+make_response\([^)]*\)" message: "Consider adding security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, etc.) to HTTP responses."
-
type: suggest message: | Python Secure Design Best Practices:
-
Implement Defense in Depth:
- Layer security controls throughout your application
- Don't rely on a single security mechanism
- Assume that each security layer can be bypassed
-
Use Secure Defaults:
- Start with secure configurations by default
- Require explicit opt-in for less secure options
- Example for Flask:
app.config.update( SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE=True, SESSION_COOKIE_HTTPONLY=True, SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE='Lax', PERMANENT_SESSION_LIFETIME=timedelta(hours=1) )
-
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 252 lines · 2,425 tokens per session scan A 6b510f95ccdb
python-insecure-design is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository abderrahimghazali/cursor-rules (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,425 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to python-insecure-design, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
010-python-tooling
Python tooling and dependency conventions for plugin-eval and tools/.
pyspark-etl-best-practices-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for PySpark ETL development with code style, joins, window functions, map operations, and Iceberg patterns.
python-flask-json-guide-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python Flask development with JSON guide.
python-llm-ml-workflow-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python LLM & ML development with workflow integration.
py-fast-api
Cursor rules for Python FastAPI backend development and best practices.
python-github-setup-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python development with GitHub setup integration.