Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/abhinav503/flutter-agenticWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/abhinav503/flutter-agentic/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/abhinav503/flutter-agentic/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/abhinav503/flutter-agentic/review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/abhinav503/flutter-agentic/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/abhinav503/flutter-agentic/review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00147 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00059 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run after any AI-generated code to catch rule violations before committing.
If no files were specified, ask: "Which files or feature should I review?"
Read the project rules in this order before checking anything:
docs/ai-rules/conventions.md— forbidden patterns and build rulesdocs/reference/architecture.md— layer boundaries, naming, DI, error flow, testing
Then audit the specified files against every check in docs/how-to/review-code.md
and report a ✅/❌ checklist. Offer to fix each violation after reporting.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 16 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a9b284a6b68c
review-code is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository abhinav503/flutter-agentic (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 147 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
security-audit
Security auditing skill for web applications and codebases. Scans for OWASP Top 10, dependency vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, XSS/CSRF/injection flaws, auth weaknesses, and misconfigurations. Use when task involves security scan, vulnerability assessment, pen test review, threat modeling, or hardening a codebase.
task-viewer
Use when the user wants to open, launch, start, or view the Claude Code task dashboard / Kanban board — a live web UI showing tasks across sessions (pending / in-progress / completed), dependencies, timeline, and activity. Wraps the standalone claude-task-viewer Express app. Not for creating or editing tasks (Claude…
agent-master
Meta-orchestrator that classifies tasks and routes to the right combination of installed skills across caveman (output compression), superpowers (dev workflow), anthropic-skills (business/domain expertise), and wired tactical libraries (wshobson, davila7, impeccable, anthropic-official). 26 routing categories…
aegis
Red-team security auditor rule for Cursor AI. Automatically triggers on security check requests or code reviews.
cubic-review-workflow
Guide for using cubic AI code review tools effectively in your development workflow.
refactorer
Refactorer agent.