Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/adobecom/express-milo/core-web-vitals-standardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adobecom/express-miloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/core-web-vitals-standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/core-web-vitals-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adobecom/express-milo/core-web-vitals-standards.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.02487 | $0.02487 |
| Opus 5 | $0.01243 | $0.01243 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00497 | $0.00497 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00249 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
core-web-vitals-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to core-web-vitals-standards — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Core Web Vitals Performance Standards
APPLY: EVERY QUERY - CRITICAL PERFORMANCE RULE
Performance is Non-Negotiable
Following AEM's "Keeping it 100" principle: Maintain Lighthouse Score 100 through Three-Phase Loading (E-L-D)
CRITICAL: CSS Render-Blocking Detection & Resolution
ALWAYS check CSS loading sequence FIRST when diagnosing slow LCP
CSS Render-Blocking Symptoms (URGENT INVESTIGATION REQUIRED)
- LCP > 3 seconds with white screen until late in loading
- Body visibility delayed despite JavaScript optimization
- Performance scores plateau despite component optimizations
- Render delay >70% in LCP breakdown
CSS Render-Blocking Root Cause
Large CSS files (>20KB) loaded via JavaScript after HTML parsing:
// ❌ ANTI-PATTERN: Render-blocking CSS via JavaScript
const link = document.createElement('link');
link.setAttribute('rel', 'stylesheet');
link.setAttribute('href', 'large-file.css'); // Blocks body visibility
document.head.appendChild(link);
REQUIRED AEM Performance Pattern
// ✅ REQUIRED: Follow AEM Three-Phase Loading for LCP optimization
// Phase E: Focus on accelerating transformation speed for LCP elements
export default async function init(el) {
// Create LCP structure immediately (synchronous DOM)
const basicStructure = createLCPStructure(el);
el.append(basicStructure);
// Phase L: Defer heavy operations to Promise.all
const enhancementPromise = Promise.all([
loadAdditionalData(),
processAsyncFeatures()
]);
// Progressive enhancement without blocking LCP
const data = await enhancementPromise;
enhanceWithData(basicStructure, data);
}
Three-Phase Loading Strategy (REQUIRED)
Based on AEM's performance best practices:
Phase E (Eager) - Critical Path to LCP
- 100kb Payload Limit: Everything before LCP MUST stay under 100kb total
- Single Origin Rule: NO connections to second origins before LCP (TLS/DNS overhead blocks LCP)
- Body Hidden Pattern:
body { display: none; }in head.html prevents premature image downloads - LCP Target: 1560ms or better on mobile (100 score in PageSpeed Insights)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 229 lines · 2,487 tokens per session scan A c3450831a164
core-web-vitals-standards is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository adobecom/express-milo (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2,487 tokens to every session, about $0.0124 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to core-web-vitals-standards, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
css-styling
CSS architecture, tokens, and styling rules for this Docusaurus site. Apply when creating or modifying components, styles, layouts, or any UI-facing code.
codex-premium-website-skills
Apply Codex Skills standards to frontend, website, motion, accessibility, QA, agent reasoning, and handoff work.
shadcn-tailwind-guide
本规范定义了使用 shadcn/ui 和 Tailwind CSS 开发新组件的标准流程和最佳实践。.
ui-components
USE WHEN: Building UI components, structuring layouts, and applying styles using Tailwind CSS.
performance
Frontend performance optimization rules. Apply when optimizing UI or bundle.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.