Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adobecom/express-miloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/lazy-loading-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/lazy-loading-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adobecom/express-milo/lazy-loading-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/lazy-loading-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adobecom/express-milo/lazy-loading-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.02427 | $0.02427 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00971 | $0.00971 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00485 | $0.00485 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00243 | $0.00243 |
Grade A, and why
lazy-loading-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to lazy-loading-implementation — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 359 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lazy Loading Performance Rules - Three-Phase Strategy
APPLY: EVERY QUERY - CRITICAL PERFORMANCE RULE
AEM Three-Phase Loading Implementation (REQUIRED)
Based on AEM's performance guidelines:
Phase Assignment Strategy
Phase E (Eager): First section only, LCP candidates, under 100kb total
Phase L (Lazy): Below-fold blocks, same-origin enhancements
Phase D (Delayed): Third-party content, 3+ seconds after LCP
Phase E - Critical Section Only (REQUIRED)
NEVER lazy load the first section - it contains LCP candidates
// ✅ REQUIRED - First section loads immediately (Phase E)
export default async function init(element) {
const isFirstSection = element.closest('.section') === document.querySelector('.section');
if (isFirstSection) {
// Critical path - load immediately for LCP
loadBlock(element);
} else {
// Below-fold - use Phase L lazy loading
createIntersectionObserver({
el: element,
options: { rootMargin: '200px' },
callback: loadBlock,
});
}
}
Phase L - IntersectionObserver Pattern (REQUIRED)
ALL non-critical blocks MUST use lazy loading following utils.js:
// ✅ REQUIRED - Standard Phase L lazy loading
export default async function init(element) {
// Check for override (testing purposes)
if (element.textContent.includes('no-lazy')) {
loadBlock(element);
return;
}
// Phase L: Lazy load with appropriate rootMargin
const blockType = element.classList[0];
const rootMargin = getOptimalRootMargin(blockType);
createIntersectionObserver({
el: element,
options: { rootMargin },
callback: () => loadBlock(element),
});
}
// Optimize loading distance based on block importance
function getOptimalRootMargin(blockType) {
const criticalBlocks = ['marquee', 'hero', 'cards'];
const heavyBlocks = ['video', 'carousel', 'interactive'];
if (criticalBlocks.includes(blockType)) return '300px'; // Load earlier
if (heavyBlocks.includes(blockType)) return '100px'; // Load closer
return '200px'; // Default
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 359 lines · 2,427 tokens per session scan A ed480040d54a
lazy-loading-implementation is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository adobecom/express-milo (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2,427 tokens to every session, about $0.0097 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to lazy-loading-implementation, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.