Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adobecom/express-miloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/resource-loading-strategy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/resource-loading-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adobecom/express-milo/resource-loading-strategy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adobecom/express-milo/resource-loading-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adobecom/express-milo/resource-loading-strategy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.02619 | $0.02619 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.01048 | $0.01048 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00524 | $0.00524 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00262 | $0.00262 |
Grade A, and why
resource-loading-strategy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to resource-loading-strategy — 46 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 358 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Resource Loading Performance Rules - Three-Phase Strategy
APPLY: EVERY QUERY - CRITICAL PERFORMANCE RULE
AEM Three-Phase Loading (E-L-D) - REQUIRED
Based on AEM's performance guidelines:
Phase E (Eager) - Critical Path to LCP
100KB BANDWIDTH BUDGET - STRICTLY ENFORCED
<!-- ✅ REQUIRED - Critical path optimization in head.html -->
<style>body { display: none; }</style>
<!-- ✅ REQUIRED - Single origin, under 100kb total -->
<script src="/express/code/scripts/scripts.js" type="module"></script>
<script src="/express/code/scripts/fallback.js" nomodule></script>
<!-- ✅ REQUIRED - Viewport meta for responsive design -->
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/>
<!-- ❌ FORBIDDEN - Before LCP (consumes bandwidth budget) -->
<!-- NO early hints, h2-push, preconnect, or font loading -->
Phase L (Lazy) - Same-Origin Enhancement
Project-controlled content that doesn't affect TBT/FID
// ✅ REQUIRED - Lazy loading for Phase L content
const loadPhaseL = () => {
// Load next sections and their blocks
loadBelowFoldSections();
// Load remaining images with lazy loading
const lazyImages = document.querySelectorAll('img[loading="lazy"]');
lazyImages.forEach(img => observeImage(img));
// Load non-blocking JavaScript libraries
loadNonCriticalModules();
};
// Start Phase L after LCP is achieved
document.addEventListener('lcp-ready', loadPhaseL);
Phase D (Delayed) - Third-Party Deferred
MANDATORY 3+ second delay after LCP
// ✅ REQUIRED - Phase D delayed loading (3+ seconds)
const loadPhaseD = (DELAY = 3000) => new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(() => {
// Marketing and analytics (not critical for CWV)
loadAnalytics();
loadTagManager();
loadConsentManagement();
// Interactive features
loadChatSupport();
loadSocialMediaEmbeds();
loadA11yTools();
// Heavy third-party integrations
loadCommentSystems();
loadVideoEmbeds();
resolve();
}, DELAY);
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 358 lines · 2,619 tokens per session scan A 766307f580c1
resource-loading-strategy is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository adobecom/express-milo (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2,619 tokens to every session, about $0.0105 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to resource-loading-strategy, differing in 46 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.