Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adonai-labs/agent-runwayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/adonai-labs/agent-runway/node-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adonai-labs/agent-runway/node-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adonai-labs/agent-runway/node-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/adonai-labs/agent-runway/node-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/adonai-labs/agent-runway/node-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00618 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
node-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Node.js Security Guidelines
Applied when working with Node.js service code. Australian English spelling throughout.
Child Process Safety
- Use
execFile(notexec) — it does not invoke a shell, eliminating shell injection - Never interpolate user-controlled data into command strings
- Validate file paths before passing to child processes; reject paths containing
..or null bytes - Set an execution timeout on all child processes; terminate on timeout
SSRF Prevention
- Validate all user-supplied URLs against an explicit allowlist of permitted hostnames before making outbound HTTP requests
- Block requests to loopback (
127.x.x.x,::1,localhost) and RFC 1918 private ranges - Use a dedicated HTTP client with configurable redirect limits; disable open redirects for internal clients
HTTP Security Headers
- Apply
helmet()middleware to every Express/Fastify app; configure CSP explicitly - Set a strict body size limit (
express.json({ limit: '100kb' })) to prevent memory exhaustion - Enable
HSTSin production; enforce HTTPS at the load balancer and in the app
Rate Limiting and Abuse Prevention
- Apply rate limiting to all public-facing endpoints; use stricter limits on auth endpoints
- Use
express-rate-limitor Fastify equivalents; back with Redis for distributed deployments - Return
429 Too Many Requestswith aRetry-Afterheader
Secrets and Environment
- Validate all required environment variables at startup with Zod; fail fast on missing secrets
- Never log secrets, tokens, or password fields; configure Pino
redactfor sensitive paths - Use a secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, Vault, Doppler) in production — not
.envfiles
Dependency Security
- Run
npm audit --audit-level=highin CI as a blocking step - Use
npm ciin CI for reproducible installs - Review and pin critical dependency versions; use Dependabot or Renovate for automated updates
- Regularly remove unused packages (
npx depcheck)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4b0a44dcddaa
node-security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository adonai-labs/agent-runway (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 618 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
optimize-dry-solid-principles-cursorrules-prompt-f
Cursor rules for optimization development with DRY and SOLID principles integration.
code-optimization
Guidelines for optimizing duplicate and poorly structured code.
language-agnostic-patterns
Language-agnostic programming patterns: SOLID, design patterns, clean code, and architecture. Load when refactoring, designing abstractions, or reviewing structure — not for everyday syntax.
code-review-en
Code Review Guidelines (English).
agent-master
Meta-orchestrator that classifies tasks and routes to the right combination of installed skills across caveman (output compression), superpowers (dev workflow), anthropic-skills (business/domain expertise), and wired tactical libraries (wshobson, davila7, impeccable, anthropic-official). 26 routing categories…
ai-dev-os-review
Performs a comprehensive self-review before creating a PR. Combines guideline compliance checking (L3) with design-level review (L2) and philosophical alignment (L1). Unlike @ai-dev-os-check which only checks rules, this also evaluates architecture decisions and code design quality.