knowledge-routing

knowledge-routing is a cursor rule for Cursor from ahmadulhoq/agentskel. It costs 38 tokens per session (66 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A knowledge-routing guide for deciding whether project information belongs in memory files, Confluence, or Jira. Confluence is a shared documentation tool, while Jira tracks work items.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before documenting information or creating a ticket. It helps choose the appropriate destination for each kind of knowledge.
Why use it?
It reduces uncertainty about where to record lessons, decisions, documentation, and tickets.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/ahmadulhoq/agentskel/knowledge-routing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmadulhoq/agentskel

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for knowledge-routing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ahmadulhoq/agentskel/knowledge-routing.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ahmadulhoq/agentskel/knowledge-routing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ahmadulhoq/agentskel/knowledge-routing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ahmadulhoq/agentskel/knowledge-routing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 66 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00038 $0.00066
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00033
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00013
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00007

Measured today against content hash f9a3e3e84aa1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

knowledge-routing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/knowledge-routing.mdc · 7 lines

What it actually says

Read and follow the full skill at .agents/skills/knowledge-routing/SKILL.md.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 7 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f9a3e3e84aa1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

knowledge-routing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ahmadulhoq/agentskel (13 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 66 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.