Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack/85-error-observability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack/85-error-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack/85-error-observability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack/85-error-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack/85-error-observability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00349 | $0.00349 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00140 | $0.00140 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00070 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
85-error-observability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Error handling:
- Use structured error responses with consistent shape: {error, code, message, details}.
- Define application-specific error codes for common failure modes.
- Catch errors at service boundaries — do not let raw exceptions leak to clients.
- Distinguish client errors (4xx) from server errors (5xx) explicitly.
- Handle timeout, rate-limit, and upstream failure cases gracefully.
- For AI/ML: handle model loading failures, inference timeouts, and malformed outputs.
Logging:
- Use structured logging (JSON format) in production.
- Include request_id / trace_id in every log entry for request tracing.
- Log at appropriate levels: DEBUG for dev, INFO for flow, WARN for recoverable, ERROR for failures.
- Log what happened and why, not just that something failed.
- Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, PII, or full request/response bodies with sensitive data.
Observability:
- Add request tracing across services (OpenTelemetry or equivalent).
- Track key metrics: request latency, error rate, queue depth, model inference time.
- Set up alerts for error rate spikes and latency degradation.
- For training: log loss curves, GPU utilization, and checkpoint save events.
Health checks:
- Every service must expose a health endpoint.
- Health checks should verify critical dependencies (DB, Redis, model loaded).
- Use liveness and readiness probes in containerized deployments.
Do not:
- Swallow exceptions silently.
- Return generic "Internal Server Error" without logging the actual cause.
- Log at ERROR level for expected/handled conditions.
- Rely solely on print statements for production debugging.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 349 tokens per session scan A e4da25f52073
85-error-observability is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 349 tokens to every session, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
You are building an AI/ML project with Python. The project uses PyTorch for model training, handles data pipelines with proper validation, tracks experiments systematically, and follows production ML engineering practices. Code is type-hinted, tested, and reproducible.
refactoring
Refactoring: systematic approach, extract/inline, guard clauses, early returns.
cross-tool-config
Cross-tool AI config: what transfers between Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Gemini, and Codex.
angular
Angular: signals, standalone components, RxJS patterns.
django
Django: models, views, ORM best practices.
fastapi
FastAPI: Pydantic v2, dependency injection, async.