99-response-style

A set of instructions for producing code and implementation plans. It emphasizes small, focused changes that match the existing project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Planning features, choosing where new code belongs, writing production-ready implementations, and identifying related tests, configuration, migrations, or documentation to update.
Why use it?
It helps keep coding work consistent and avoids unnecessary files, abstractions, or changes to unrelated parts of the project.

Cursor rule

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack/99-response-style
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack
Per session 144 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 144 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00144 $0.00144
Opus 5 $0.00072 $0.00072
Sonnet 5 $0.00029 $0.00029
Haiku 4.5 $0.00014 $0.00014

Measured 2d ago against content hash 85a9c9e2fb3a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

99-response-style scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

rules/99-response-style.mdc · 19 lines

What it actually says

When implementing:

  • Prefer precise, minimal, production-ready changes.
  • Explain architecture briefly when it matters.
  • Generate only the necessary files and edits.
  • Respect existing repository conventions.
  • If a task is large, break it into clean phases but still produce usable code.
  • When adding a new module, place it in the correct layer and name it clearly.
  • When relevant, mention follow-up files the team should also update, such as env examples, migrations, tests, or docs.

Do not:

  • Produce toy code when production code is requested.
  • Invent random abstractions without need.
  • Change unrelated code paths.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 19 lines · 144 tokens per session scan A 85a9c9e2fb3a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

99-response-style is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository aiagentwithdhruv/ai-dev-stack (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 144 tokens to every session, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.