Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/altaidevorg/rules-for-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/altaidevorg/rules-for-ai/toolcontext)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/altaidevorg/rules-for-ai/toolcontext"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/altaidevorg/rules-for-ai/toolcontext/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/altaidevorg/rules-for-ai/toolcontext"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/altaidevorg/rules-for-ai/toolcontext.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03817 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01527 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00763 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00382 |
Grade A, and why
toolcontext scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Chapter 10: ToolContext
In the previous chapter, we learned about InvocationContext, the object encapsulating all necessary information for a single agent turn. While components like callbacks receive a CallbackContext that wraps InvocationContext and provides delta-aware state access, Tools (BaseTool) require slightly more specific information during their execution. This chapter introduces ToolContext, the specialized context object passed directly to a tool's run_async method.
Motivation and Use Case
When an LLM decides to invoke a Tool (BaseTool), the framework needs to execute the tool's specific logic. This logic often requires:
- Access to the general turn context (session, services, etc.) provided by InvocationContext.
- Access to the session's State, both for reading existing information and for recording changes made by the tool.
- A unique identifier linking this specific tool execution back to the LLM's function call request, especially if multiple tools might be called in parallel.
- A mechanism for the tool to signal outcomes or requirements back to the framework, such as state updates, artifact creation/updates, or the need for user authorization.
ToolContext fulfills these needs. It inherits from CallbackContext, giving it access to the delta-aware state and services. Crucially, it adds the function_call_id specific to the tool invocation and directly exposes the actions object (EventActions) for the tool to modify.
Central Use Case: A user asks an agent equipped with a get_weather tool: "What's the weather like in London?". The agent's BaseLlmFlow receives a FunctionCall from the LLM.
- The flow creates a
ToolContextinstance, passing the current InvocationContext and theidfrom theFunctionCall. - The flow calls
get_weather_tool.run_async(args={'location': 'London'}, tool_context=ctx). - Inside
run_async, the tool usesctx.function_call_idfor logging or associating results. - It might read user preferences from state:
units = ctx.state.get(State.USER_PREFIX + 'weather_units', 'celsius'). - After fetching the weather (e.g., 15 degrees Celsius), it uses
ctx.actions.state_deltato store the result:ctx.state['last_weather_query'] = {'location': 'London', 'temp': 15, 'units': 'celsius'}. (Remember,ctx.statewrites to the delta inctx.actions). - The tool returns its primary result (e.g., the dictionary
{'location': 'London', 'temp': 15, 'units': 'celsius'}). - The flow uses the
function_call_idfrom the context to correctly format theFunctionResponseand includes thestate_deltacaptured inctx.actionswithin the resulting Event.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 258 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4748bd9e2bc2
toolcontext is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository altaidevorg/rules-for-ai (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,817 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.