Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andr-ca/agentharnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00859 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing
This skill is self-contained for day-to-day use. Deeper reference (needs
the full harness checkout): patterns/testing/TDD.md (full TDD
workflow), patterns/testing/COVERAGE_REQUIREMENTS.md (80% rule and
pragma), patterns/testing/PLAYWRIGHT_UI_TESTING.md (E2E screenshots),
patterns/testing/COMPLETION_CHECKLIST.md.
Rigor tiers — apply the right standard, not the maximum
| Tier | Coverage | TDD | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production | ≥ 80% line+branch | Required | Libraries, agents, shipped services |
| Internal | Must have tests | Recommended | No numeric floor; cover what's expensive to get wrong |
| Prototype | None required | Optional | Skip freely; document the decision |
Check .agentharness-profile or .github/CODING_GUIDELINES.md for the
project's tier before assuming 80% applies.
Red-Green-Refactor
- Red — write a failing test for the one behavior you're adding.
- Green — write the minimum code to make it pass (not the final code — the correct code comes in the next step).
- Refactor — clean up duplication and naming while tests stay green.
Never skip Red — a test that never fails doesn't prove anything.
Test one behavior per test
# WRONG: five assertions for one behavior — one failure hides the rest
def test_user_creation():
user = User.create(email="[email protected]", password="s3cr3t")
assert user.id is not None
assert user.email == "[email protected]"
assert user.password_hash is not None
assert user.created_at is not None
assert user.is_active is True
# RIGHT: one assertion covers "all fields are set" as a single behavior
def test_user_creation_populates_all_fields():
user = User.create(email="[email protected]", password="s3cr3t")
assert user == {
"id": AnyString(),
"email": "[email protected]",
"password_hash": AnyString(),
"created_at": AnyDatetime(),
"is_active": True,
}
Split into multiple tests only when the behaviors can independently fail for unrelated reasons.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 99 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 941470d7d30e
testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository andr-ca/agentharness (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 859 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
manual-review
The main set of rules for manual review during an active project change. It defines different kinds of checks, who performs them, how results are recorded, and when supporting evidence is required.
manual-review.backend
A set of rules for verifying backend-only changes and changes that use different verification channels. It separates evidence the agent can collect from checks that require a person, a production authorization, or a business decision.
tell-proof-verify
Auto-run Tell Proof verification after UI-changing edits.
entire-external-agent
Build standalone external agent binaries for the Entire CLI using E2E-first TDD.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.