Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Angry-Robot-Deals/ace-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/angry-robot-deals/ace-mcp/van-qa-main)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/angry-robot-deals/ace-mcp/van-qa-main"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/angry-robot-deals/ace-mcp/van-qa-main/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/angry-robot-deals/ace-mcp/van-qa-main"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/angry-robot-deals/ace-mcp/van-qa-main.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01404 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00702 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00281 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
van-qa-main scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to van-qa-main — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
VAN MODE: QA TECHNICAL VALIDATION (Main Entry)
TL;DR: This is the entry point for the QA validation process that executes after CREATIVE mode and before BUILD mode. It ensures technical requirements are met before implementation begins.
📣 HOW TO USE THESE QA RULES
To access any QA validation rule or component, use the fetch_rules tool with exact rule names:
// CRITICAL: Always use fetch_rules to load validation components
// For detailed examples and guidance, load:
// isolation_rules/visual-maps/van-qa-utils/rule-calling-guide
🚀 VAN QA MODE ACTIVATION
After completing CREATIVE mode, when the user types "VAN QA", respond:
graph TD
UserQA["User Types: QA"] --> HighPriority["⚠️ HIGH PRIORITY COMMAND"]
HighPriority --> CurrentTask["Pause Current Task/Process"]
CurrentTask --> LoadQA["Load QA Main Map (This File)"]
LoadQA --> RunQA["Execute QA Validation Process"]
RunQA --> QAResults{"QA Results"}
QAResults -->|"PASS"| ResumeFlow["Resume Prior Process Flow"]
QAResults -->|"FAIL"| FixIssues["Fix Identified Issues"]
FixIssues --> ReRunQA["Re-run QA Validation"]
ReRunQA --> QAResults
style UserQA fill:#f8d486,stroke:#e8b84d,color:black
style HighPriority fill:#ff0000,stroke:#cc0000,color:white,stroke-width:3px
style LoadQA fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white
style RunQA fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white
style QAResults fill:#f6546a,stroke:#c30052,color:white
QA Interruption Rules
- Immediate Precedence:
QAcommand interrupts everything. - Load & Execute: Load this map (
van-qa-main.mdc) and its components (see below). - Remediation Priority: Fixes take priority over pending mode switches.
- Resume: On PASS, resume the previous flow.
⚠️ QA OVERRIDE ACTIVATED
All other processes paused
QA validation checks now running...
Any issues found MUST be remediated before continuing with normal process flow
🔍 TECHNICAL VALIDATION OVERVIEW
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 142 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 76548d715d07
van-qa-main is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Angry-Robot-Deals/ace-mcp (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,404 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to van-qa-main, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
20-testing-generated-and-structure
Testing expectations, generated-file boundaries, and CLI structure contract.
fuzzing
Fuzzing setup and guidelines for skia-rs.
testing-and-quality
The testcomprehensive.py provides systematic testing of all 31 MCP tools.
smoke-monkey-tester
Smoke tests for core functionality and monkey/chaos tests aiming to break the system with randomized inputs. / TR: Sistemin temel fonksiyonlarını kontrol eden smoke testler ve rastgele girdilerle sistemi çökertmeyi hedefleyen monkey/chaos testleri.
STAGE_S5_TEST_POINTS
A staged workflow for turning approved requirements into a complete list of test points. It checks required earlier documents and records any requirement that has no matching test point.
testing
Testing conventions for Ion Design System using Jest and Angular Testing Library.