lint

lint is a cursor rule for Cursor from ApexIQ/skillsmith. It costs 104 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

A project workflow for running a linter and correcting reported style problems. A linter is a tool that finds code patterns that break agreed rules or may cause mistakes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check and fix stylistic issues in Click, pytest, and the listed architecture libraries.
Why use it?
It removes repetitive manual style checks and helps keep code consistent.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/apexiq/skillsmith/lint
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ApexIQ/skillsmith

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for lint

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/apexiq/skillsmith/lint.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/apexiq/skillsmith/lint)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/apexiq/skillsmith/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/apexiq/skillsmith/lint.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 104 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 104 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00104 $0.00104
Opus 5 $0.00052 $0.00052
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00021
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00010

Measured yesterday against content hash c91ac1cf35ac, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/workflows/lint.mdc · 11 lines

What it actually says

  • Read .agent/workflows/lint.md.
  • Goal: run linter and fix stylistic issues for library click, pytest, arch-business-logic, arch-ui, arch-unknown
  • Skills: notebooklm, javascript_testing_patterns, makepad_skills, loki_mode, terraform_module_library
  • Follow the workflow steps, then verify with project tests or the closest validation command.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 11 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A c91ac1cf35ac

Subscribe to this mod's changes

lint is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ApexIQ/skillsmith (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.