js-best-practices

js-best-practices is a cursor rule for coding agents from arinspunk/extended-context. It costs 0 tokens per session (693 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A set of Cursor rules for writing JavaScript, including guidance on modern syntax and asynchronous code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when writing or reviewing JavaScript, especially code using async operations.
Why use it?
It gives the codebase consistent expectations for common JavaScript patterns.

Cursor rule

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/arinspunk/extended-context/js-best-practices
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arinspunk/extended-context

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for js-best-practices

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/arinspunk/extended-context/js-best-practices.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/arinspunk/extended-context/js-best-practices)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/arinspunk/extended-context/js-best-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/arinspunk/extended-context/js-best-practices.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 693 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00693
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00347
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00139
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00069

Measured 3d ago against content hash 2592b6a2f85d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

js-best-practices scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

rules/guidelines/js-best-practices.mdc · 130 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 130 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2592b6a2f85d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

js-best-practices is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository arinspunk/extended-context (2 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 693 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.