Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asasugar/SuperSpecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/asasugar/superspec/git-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/asasugar/superspec/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/asasugar/superspec/git-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/asasugar/superspec/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/asasugar/superspec/git-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00132 | $0.00132 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
git-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Git Commit 规则
禁止 Co-authored-by
执行 git commit 时，禁止在 commit message 中添加 Co-authored-by 行。
提交格式示例：
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
feat: 功能描述
EOF
)"
❌ 禁止：
feat: 功能描述
Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]>
✅ 正确：
feat: 功能描述
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 132 tokens per session scan A f9fe6de04ec2
git-commit is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository asasugar/SuperSpec (18 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 132 tokens to every session, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
mstar-cursor-plan-mode
When using Cursor Plan mode with Morning Star, dual-write CreatePlan to .mstar/ harness artifacts and require per-task commits.
git
Git workflow — commit format, push policy, and PR process.
commit-sponsors
Every git commit message must acknowledge BetterDesk supporters.
commits
Conventional Commits standards for clear, semantic commit messages.
no-ai-contributors
Never add AI tools as git authors or project contributors.
conventional-commits
Use the Conventional Commit Messages specification to generate commit messages.