Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BambooGap/skills-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bamboogap/skills-orchestrator/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00077 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
PR Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PR Review
Systematic PR review process with blocking/suggestion/nit severity levels
如需完整内容，请使用
skills-orchestrator sync --full导出
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 13 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9a35cf09dac9
PR Review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository BambooGap/skills-orchestrator (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 77 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
hatch3r-reviewer-calibration
Reviewer runtime confidence-calibration contract: every Nth (default N=5) consecutive clean PASS triggers an out-of-band second-pass review before loop exit; divergence reverts to REQUEST CHANGES; each second pass logs to .hatch3r/calibration-log.jsonl. Canonical source of the N-default and the directive that…
hatch3r-contract-census
Shared-contract discipline for brownfield changes — contract taxonomy, repo-wide consumer census as lane-exit gate, seam-owner protocol for parallel lanes, façade contract-hold on field drop/rename, value-drift census for shared constants.
hatch3r-findings-ledger
Write-ahead findings ledger — every review-loop finding is registered on disk before fix dispatch, folds to a terminal disposition at run exit, and survives interruption; no finding ends a run pending.
133-code-quality-review
133: Code quality and review standards.
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.