Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/basher83/lunar-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/basher83/lunar-claude/github-content)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/basher83/lunar-claude/github-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/basher83/lunar-claude/github-content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/basher83/lunar-claude/github-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/basher83/lunar-claude/github-content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00850 | $0.00850 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00340 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00170 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00085 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
github-content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Content Access Rules
Always Use GitHub MCP Tools for GitHub Content
When accessing content from GitHub repositories, ALWAYS use GitHub MCP tools instead of web scraping, Firecrawl, or other methods.
Why Use GitHub MCP Tools
- Purpose-built: Designed specifically for GitHub API access
- More reliable: Uses official GitHub API with proper authentication
- Better performance: Handles rate limits and caching automatically
- Structured data: Returns metadata (SHA, file size, URLs) along with content
- Version control: Can access specific commits, branches, or tags
Available GitHub MCP Tools
File and Directory Access
mcp_github_get_file_contents- Get file or directory contents- Use for: Reading files, listing directories, accessing specific commits/branches
- Example:
mcp_github_get_file_contents(owner="anthropics", repo="skills", path="mcp-builder/SKILL.md")
Repository Information
mcp_github_get_commit- Get commit detailsmcp_github_list_commits- List commits in a branchmcp_github_list_branches- List repository branchesmcp_github_list_tags- List repository tags
Code Search
mcp_github_search_code- Search code across repositoriesmcp_github_search_repositories- Search for repositories
Pull Requests and Issues
mcp_github_get_pull_request- Get PR detailsmcp_github_get_pull_request_files- Get files changed in PRmcp_github_get_pull_request_diff- Get PR diffmcp_github_list_issues- List repository issuesmcp_github_get_issue- Get issue details
When to Use GitHub MCP vs Other Tools
Use GitHub MCP For
- Reading files from GitHub repositories
- Listing directory contents
- Accessing specific commits, branches, or tags
- Searching code within GitHub
- Getting PR/issue information
- Any GitHub content access
Do NOT Use GitHub MCP For
- Non-GitHub websites (use Firecrawl/web_search)
- GitHub pages/docs sites (use Firecrawl if GitHub MCP doesn't work)
- General web content
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 850 tokens per session scan A 06579bca3065
github-content is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository basher83/lunar-claude (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 850 tokens to every session, about $0.0034 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
rebase-only-merged-agents
When rebasing after a merge, only rebase the agents whose branches you just merged. Do not rebase agents that are still running.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
git-workflow
Rules for git operations, commit strategy, and GitHub CLI usage.
release-checklist
What to update with each code change or version release.
git-workflow
Git commit format and PR process - conventional commits.
branching-merging-strategy
This is a set of instructions to the AI Assistant for branching and merging strategy.