rhdh-local-protection

rhdh-local-protection is a cursor rule for Cursor from benwilcock/rhdh-lab. It costs 316 tokens per session, scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A set of protection rules for the pristine `rhdh-local/` project directory, which contains an upstream Red Hat Developer Hub Local checkout. Custom changes belong in a separate `rhdh-customizations/` directory.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when changing configuration: edit the customization directory, run its apply script, and restart the local project. Reading the protected directory is allowed.
Why use it?
It prevents local customizations from modifying the upstream checkout and making future updates or comparisons harder.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Use it when changing configuration: edit the customization directory, run its apply script, and restart the local project. Reading the protected directory is allowed.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benwilcock/rhdh-lab

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rhdh-local-protection

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rhdh-local-protection

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/benwilcock/rhdh-lab/rhdh-local-protection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 316 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 316 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00316 $0.00316
Opus 5 $0.00158 $0.00158
Sonnet 5 $0.00063 $0.00063
Haiku 4.5 $0.00032 $0.00032

Measured today against content hash df674ca58903, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rhdh-local-protection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/rhdh-local-protection.mdc · 19 lines

What it actually says

Protect the rhdh-local Upstream Submodule

rhdh-local/ is an exact checkout of redhat-developer/rhdh-local. Treat it as immutable source, not a configuration directory.

  • Never edit, create, delete, copy, generate, or mount-source files inside rhdh-local/.
  • Never use rhdh-local/ as the destination for customization scripts, including ignored files such as .env, compose.override.yaml, *.local.yaml, translations, or credentials.
  • Make every functional change in rhdh-customizations/, root-level lab, .cursor/, or docs/ only.
  • lab must compose the upstream file with the external rhdh-customizations/compose.override.yaml overlay. Do not add an override file to the submodule.
  • Before and after work that affects the lab, verify git -C rhdh-local diff --quiet and that no customization files exist in the submodule.

The only permitted submodule operation is an explicitly requested upstream version update: create/verify a backup, update the submodule to a chosen upstream commit, and commit only the resulting gitlink in this parent repository. Never change files within that commit.

If a required upstream mount cannot be overridden externally, stop and explain the limitation. Do not work around it by modifying the submodule.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · -25 lines · +316 tokens per session df674ca58903
  2. 9d ago First seen · 44 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 30e25d45ffb1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rhdh-local-protection is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository benwilcock/rhdh-lab (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 316 tokens to every session, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.