Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BetterTyped/hype-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/git-and-monorepo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/git-and-monorepo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/git-and-monorepo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/git-and-monorepo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/git-and-monorepo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00329 | $0.00329 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00132 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00066 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
git-and-monorepo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Git and Monorepo
Commit messages
Commits follow the conventional-commit + git-cz emoji style already in the history:
feat: 🎸 <subject>— new featurefix: 🐛 <subject>— bug fixfix: 💄 <subject>— visual/style fixchore: <subject>— tooling, deps, housekeepingrefactor: <subject>— behavior-preserving restructuringdocs: ✏️ <subject>— documentation
Subject is imperative and lowercase ("add invitation flow", not "Added invitation flow."). Match this format exactly when authoring commits.
Monorepo
pnpm workspaces + Nx.
- Internal packages are
@hype-stack/*and referenced with"workspace:*"— never a version number. - Shared code used by multiple apps lives in
packages/; code used by one app stays inside that app. Don't promote topackages/until a second real consumer exists. - Run app-scoped scripts with
pnpm --filter @hype-stack/<app> <script>; repo-wide targets run through the root scripts (Nx handles caching and ordering). - Add dependencies to the specific app or package that uses them, not the workspace root (root is for tooling only).
- After changing generated types or cross-app contracts (backend routes, socket events, enums), regenerate with
pnpm generateso dependent apps pick up the new types.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 329 tokens per session scan A a6aabce69f30
git-and-monorepo is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository BetterTyped/hype-stack (12 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 329 tokens to every session, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
git-flow
Branching, commits and PR hygiene. Always applies.
git
Git workflow — commit format, push policy, and PR process.
commit-sponsors
Every git commit message must acknowledge BetterDesk supporters.
no-ai-contributors
Never add AI tools as git authors or project contributors.
git-discipline
Commit, push, and branching rules. Owns ALL git behavior; other files state only their deviations.
git-commit-standards
Enforce structured Git commit messages.