Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BetterTyped/hype-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/testing-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/testing-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/testing-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/testing-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bettertyped/hype-stack/testing-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00235 | $0.00235 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00094 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
testing-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Testing Workflow
When Building Features
When implementing or modifying a feature - frontend, backend, or packages - add tests where possible. Follow the backend and frontend testing guidelines for conventions.
Avoid Trivial Tests
Do not write tests that:
- Assert only that a component renders without crashing (with no meaningful assertions)
- Mirror the implementation line-by-line with no added confidence
- Test framework/library behavior rather than project logic
- Cover only auto-generated or purely declarative code (types, config objects, re-exports)
Every test should justify its existence by catching a realistic regression.
When You Chose Not to Test
If you finish feature work that could reasonably be tested but you decided not to, ask the user before closing out:
"I didn't add tests for this change because [reason]. Would you like me to add any?"
Don't ask when the change is inherently untestable or trivial - styles, enums, constants, config files, re-exports, type definitions, static assets. Just skip silently.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 235 tokens per session scan A 703119341daa
testing-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository BetterTyped/hype-stack (12 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 235 tokens to every session, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
upgrade-tests
// ✅ CORRECT: Upgrade package pattern await using ctx = testReactResource(appRouter, { server: { // server configuration }, client(opts) { return { links: [ httpLink({ url: opts.httpUrl, // client configuration }), ], }; }, }).
react-query-tests
// ✅ CORRECT: Legacy React Query pattern const ctx = konn() .beforeEach(() => createAppRouter()) .afterEach((ctx) => ctx?.close?.()) .done().
tanstack-react-query-tests
// ✅ CORRECT: Use await using for automatic cleanup await using ctx = testReactResource(appRouter, { server: { // server configuration }, client(opts) { return { links: [ httpLink({ url: opts.httpUrl, // client configuration }), ], }; }, }).
verify
Review implementation ownership and verify Plate packages, editor states and registry artifacts through their actual proof owners. Use before writing a plan's phase exits or proof gates, before checking, skipping, deferring or moving any plan proof gate to limits, before writing or changing any test, including…
benchmark
Measure and repair Plate/Slate performance, or review a performance design before running its applicable benchmark lanes. Use before writing, reviewing, running, rerunning, checking, skipping or deferring a performance gate, including a plan's scale gate, before writing a benchmark script, before explaining a…
common-fixes
Utility for VAN QA common validation fixes.