Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/flutter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/flutter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/flutter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/flutter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills/flutter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02389 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01195 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
flutter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to flutter — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 477 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flutter Best Practices
Overview
| Aspect | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Version | Flutter 3.x |
| Design | Material 3 |
| State | Riverpod or BLoC |
| Architecture | Clean Architecture / MVVM |
| Routing | go_router |
Project Structure
lib/
├── app/
│ └── app.dart # App widget & theme
├── core/
│ ├── constants/
│ ├── errors/
│ ├── network/
│ └── utils/
├── features/
│ ├── auth/
│ │ ├── data/
│ │ │ ├── datasources/
│ │ │ ├── models/
│ │ │ └── repositories/
│ │ ├── domain/
│ │ │ ├── entities/
│ │ │ ├── repositories/
│ │ │ └── usecases/
│ │ └── presentation/
│ │ ├── pages/
│ │ ├── widgets/
│ │ └── providers/ # or blocs/
│ └── home/
│ └── ...
├── shared/
│ ├── widgets/
│ └── providers/
└── main.dart
Widget Patterns
Stateless Widget
class UserCard extends StatelessWidget {
const UserCard({
super.key,
required this.user,
this.onTap,
});
final User user;
final VoidCallback? onTap;
@override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
final theme = Theme.of(context);
return Card(
child: InkWell(
onTap: onTap,
borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(12),
child: Padding(
padding: const EdgeInsets.all(16),
child: Row(
children: [
CircleAvatar(
backgroundImage: NetworkImage(user.avatarUrl),
),
const SizedBox(width: 16),
Expanded(
child: Column(
crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start,
children: [
Text(
user.name,
style: theme.textTheme.titleMedium,
),
Text(
user.email,
style: theme.textTheme.bodySmall,
),
],
),
),
],
),
),
),
);
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 477 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5ab4e287047d
flutter is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Bilal140202/the-lord-of-the-skills (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,389 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to flutter, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
swift-uikit-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Swift Uikit.
swiftui-guidelines-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for SwiftUI development guidelines.
android-jetpack-compose-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Android development with Jetpack Compose integration.
swift-architecture-auditor
Swift & iOS/macOS mimari inceleme, SwiftUI/UIKit katman analizi, MVVM/VIPER/TCA kontrolü, Concurrency ve Memory Leak denetim skilli.
swiftui
SwiftUI best practices for iOS, macOS, and cross-platform Apple development.
compose-coroutines
Compose scroll/coroutine patterns — prevent programmatic scroll from being mistaken for user scroll, cancellation-safe flag resets.