Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/failed-experimentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/briangmilnes/APAS-VERUSWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
failed-experiments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Failed Experiments
When an experiment file fails verification:
- DO NOT modify it to pass (no adding
assume, no commenting out failing assertions) - DO NOT remove dead code — failed attempts stay as documentation
- DO add a
RESULT: FAILScomment at the top explaining what fails - DO comment out the module in
lib.rsso the project validates
Failed experiments are valuable documentation of what Verus cannot (yet) do.
Example
//! Proof time test: Does X work?
//! RESULT: FAILS - assertion on line 30 cannot be proven
// ... original failing code unchanged ...
In lib.rs:
// pub mod experiment_that_fails; // FAILS - see file header
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 32 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5ee397dc1c5f
failed-experiments is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository briangmilnes/APAS-VERUS (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 196 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.
family-instance-domain-actions
Family instance domain action implementation patterns.