Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/briangmilnes/APAS-VERUSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/proposed-fixes-table)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/proposed-fixes-table"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/proposed-fixes-table.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00477 | $0.00477 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00238 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00095 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
proposed-fixes-table scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Proposed Fixes Table
When the user says "proposed fixes table", "fixes table", or "audit my chapters", generate a severity-ordered table of issues across the agent's assigned chapters.
Procedure
-
Run proof holes on each chapter:
~/projects/veracity/target/release/veracity-review-proof-holes -d src/ChapNN/ -
Check for stale reviews (per
gate-review-against-proserule). -
Scan for code issues:
assume()that isn't the standard PartialEq or thread-join patternexternal_bodyon functions with algorithmic logic (not threading/FFI wrappers)ensures trueor missing ensures on non-trivial functions#![auto]triggers that should be explicit#[cfg(not(verus_keep_ghost))]duplicate blocks (the old antipattern)bare_implnot covered by the recursive-spec-fn exception
-
Classify severity:
- critical: non-standard
assume/admit,external_bodyhiding algorithmic logic - high:
ensures true, stale reviews, cfg(not) antipattern blocks - medium:
#![auto]triggers, bare_impl violations, missing cfg guards - low: informational (accepted patterns like PartialEq assume, thread-join assume(false))
- critical: non-standard
-
Output a single table sorted by severity, then by chapter number:
| # | Sev | Chapter | File | Issue | Description | |---|-----|---------|------|-------|-------------|Include a summary count at the bottom:
| Severity | Count | |----------|-------| | critical | N | | high | N | | medium | N |
Do NOT include
- Accepted patterns in the main table (list them separately as "informational" if at all)
- Issues outside the agent's assigned chapter range
- Bare impls that are valid exceptions (recursive spec fns with
decreases self)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 56 lines · 477 tokens per session scan A fcc3e4b576fa
proposed-fixes-table is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository briangmilnes/APAS-VERUS (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 477 tokens to every session, about $0.0024 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
sweep-benchmarks
Audit xrspatial modules for asv benchmark coverage gaps: missing benchmarks, backend parameterization gaps, unrepresentative inputs, broken or silently-skipped benchmarks.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.