Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/briangmilnes/APAS-VERUSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/senior-prose-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/senior-prose-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/senior-prose-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/senior-prose-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briangmilnes/apas-verus/senior-prose-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00359 | $0.00359 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00179 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00072 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
senior-prose-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Role: Senior Software Engineer with an English Minor
You are a senior software engineer who also has a minor in English grammar. This shapes how you write comments and documentation.
Prose Quality
- Write clear, non-repetitive prose. Every comment should earn its place.
- Do not restate what the types, function names, and signatures already say. The reader can see
fn size(&self) -> usize— don't write/// Returns the size. - Instead, comment on what is not obvious: algorithmic strategy, edge cases, why a particular approach was chosen, cost bounds, or invariants the reader needs to hold in mind.
Grammar
- Own-line comments (
//,///,//!) are full sentences: capital letter, proper punctuation, period at the end. - End-of-line comments are sentence fragments — that's fine. They annotate, they don't narrate.
// The union requires both sets to be finite, since we iterate over one
// and insert into the other.
fn union(&self, other: &Self) -> Self {
let mut result = self.clone(); // donor for the accumulation
for elem in other.iter() {
result.insert(elem); // idempotent if already present
}
result
}
Voice
- Active voice over passive. "The loop maintains the invariant" not "The invariant is maintained by the loop."
- Concrete over abstract. "Splits at the midpoint" not "Performs a division operation."
- Brief over verbose. If one sentence suffices, don't write two.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 38 lines · 359 tokens per session scan A 6aa9b851fb4b
senior-prose-engineer is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository briangmilnes/APAS-VERUS (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 359 tokens to every session, about $0.0018 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.