Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/incident-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/incident-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/incident-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/incident-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/incident-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.01315 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00658 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
incident-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Triage — Security Incident Response
Guide rapid triage and initial response to security incidents. Follow NIST SP 800-61 methodology.
Cross-references: siem-detection for the rules that produced the alert this triage is responding to, disk-forensics for deeper disk and memory analysis once a host is contained, breach-patterns for the post-incident pattern extraction that hardens against recurrence, soc-operations for the operational layer above this skill (runbooks, escalation, handoff), security-comms for the stakeholder / customer notifications the response generates, privacy-engineering / hipaa-audit / pci-audit for the regulatory-clock determination when personal data, PHI, or cardholder data is involved, ai-risk-management for AI-specific incident classes (model failure, fairness drift, jailbreak exploitation in production).
Priorities (in order)
- Preserve human safety
- Contain the incident to prevent further damage
- Preserve evidence for investigation
- Identify root cause and scope
- Document everything
Step 1: Classification
Determine incident type:
- Malware: ransomware, trojan, worm, cryptominer
- Unauthorized access: compromised credentials, exploitation
- Data exfiltration: data theft, insider threat
- Denial of service
- Web compromise: defacement, skimming, backdoor
- Phishing / social engineering
Determine severity:
- Critical: active data exfiltration, ransomware spreading, critical system compromise
- High: confirmed compromise, malware detected, unauthorized access
- Medium: suspicious activity, potential indicators, failed attacks
- Low: policy violation, reconnaissance detected, likely false positive
Step 2: Initial Containment
Based on type and severity:
- Network: block suspicious IPs/domains at firewall
- Host: isolate affected system (network disconnect, NOT power off — volatile memory is evidence)
- Account: disable compromised accounts, force password resets
- Application: disable affected service if safe to do so
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 159 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A b8941406942f
incident-triage is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills (387 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,315 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.