Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/owasp-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/owasp-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/owasp-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/owasp-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills/owasp-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00197 | $0.12289 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00079 | $0.04916 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.02458 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01229 |
Grade A, and why
owasp-audit scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Only audit code the user owns or is authorized to review. Any live check (for example `curl -I` against a deployed How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 475 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OWASP Audit — Source Code Security Review
Perform a systematic security audit of application source code against the OWASP Top 10:2025. Every candidate is traced, then independently challenged, before it becomes a finding. Coverage is recorded per surface and trust boundary, so "clean" means someone actually read the code.
Cross-references:
api-auditfor a surface-driven pass over every API endpoint (shares the recon, verification, and orchestration references)web-pentest"Combined white-box + black-box mode" when you have both the source and a running instance you're authorized to testbusiness-logic-testingto prove race conditions and logic flaws dynamically (A06)dependency-auditfor the full A03 supply-chain picture;secrets-auditfor leaked credentialsthreat-modelingfor the principal / trust-boundary vocabulary used in reconfinding-triageto take a single finding from this report to a defensible disposition
Authorization and Mode
Only audit code the user owns or is authorized to review. Any live check (for example curl -I against a deployed
origin) needs the same authorization for that host and stays non-destructive.
Pick the mode before starting:
- Guidance (default): a question, a single file, or "how do I secure X". Answer directly. Findings still follow the verdict rules below. No ledger required.
- Full audit: the user explicitly asks to audit or security-review a codebase, a release, or a PR. Run the full workflow below.
- Diff / PR-scoped: the user wants a branch, PR, or commit range reviewed, or a pre-merge gate. Run the full workflow limited to the change, using references/diff-review.md.
If it's ambiguous, ask one question: guidance pass or full audit (and which profile)?
Workflow (full audit)
- Scope: what's in, what's out, mode, and run profile
- Recon: write
architecture.mdandcoverage.jsonbefore hunting - Hunt: work the category checklist unit by unit (subagents for large codebases)
- Verify every finding: an independent refutation pass gives each candidate one verdict
- Coverage critic: look for unmapped surfaces and thin coverage
- Write and validate
findings.json - Render the report from the JSON
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +110 lines · +55 tokens per session scan B → A 790b7cbcbbde
- 1mo ago First seen · 365 lines · 142 tokens per session scan B 0136edc20c0a
owasp-audit is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills (435 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 197 tokens to every session and 12,289 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
sweep-benchmarks
Audit xrspatial modules for asv benchmark coverage gaps: missing benchmarks, backend parameterization gaps, unrepresentative inputs, broken or silently-skipped benchmarks.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.