Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brunogama/ios-cursor-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/brunogama/ios-cursor-rules/visualization-rule)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/brunogama/ios-cursor-rules/visualization-rule"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/brunogama/ios-cursor-rules/visualization-rule/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/brunogama/ios-cursor-rules/visualization-rule"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/brunogama/ios-cursor-rules/visualization-rule.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00810 | $0.00810 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00324 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00162 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00081 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
visualization-rule scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Visualization System
Rule for generating visual representations of project elements to improve understanding and communication.
actions:
-
type: react conditions:
- pattern: "visualize specs|diagram specs" action: |
Generate specification visualization
I'll create a visual representation of project specifications:
- Generate a dependency diagram showing relationships between specs
- Create a completion heatmap showing progress across domains
- Visualize requirement distribution and completion status
- Show timeline of specification development
The visualization will use SVG or Mermaid diagrams for easy rendering.
-
type: react conditions:
- pattern: "visualize tasks|diagram tasks" action: |
Generate task visualization
I'll create a visual representation of project tasks:
- Generate a Gantt chart of tasks with timelines
- Create a kanban-style board visualization showing task status
- Show task dependencies and critical paths
- Visualize task distribution across domains
This provides a quick visual overview of project progress.
-
type: react conditions:
- pattern: "visualize knowledge|diagram knowledge" action: |
Generate knowledge visualization
I'll create a visual representation of the knowledge base:
- Generate a knowledge map showing relationships between learnings
- Create category distribution charts
- Show knowledge growth over time
- Visualize knowledge clusters and gaps
This helps identify patterns and relationships in captured knowledge.
-
type: react conditions:
- pattern: "visualize architecture|diagram architecture" action: |
Generate architecture visualization
I'll create a visual representation of the project architecture:
- Generate component diagrams showing system structure
- Create sequence diagrams for key workflows
- Visualize data flow between components
- Show dependency relationships
This provides a clear visual understanding of system design.
-
type: react event: "task_summary" action: |
Automatically include task visualizations in summaries
When generating task summaries, I'll include:
- Visual progress indicators
- Timeline charts of task completion
- Distribution visualizations by category
- Burndown/burnup charts
This adds visual context to textual reports.
-
type: suggest message: |
Visualization System
I can create visual representations of project elements:
Commands:
visualize specs- Create specification relationship and progress diagramsvisualize tasks- Generate task timelines and status visualizationsvisualize knowledge- Create knowledge maps and category chartsvisualize architecture- Generate system architecture diagrams
Automatic Behaviors:
- When generating reports → Include relevant visualizations
- When summarizing status → Add visual progress indicators
Visualizations use SVG or Mermaid diagrams and can be exported for documentation.
examples:
-
input: | visualize specs output: "Generated specification visualization showing relationships and completion status across 24 specifications."
-
input: | visualize architecture output: "Created architecture diagram showing 5 core components and their interactions."
metadata: priority: high version: 1.0
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 810 tokens per session scan A 24556cbedf81
visualization-rule is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository brunogama/ios-cursor-rules (75 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 810 tokens to every session, about $0.0032 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
swiftui
Rules for IcySky, a SwiftUI project for a bluesky client.
202-swift-standards-detailed
A detailed set of coding standards for Swift 6.2 and Apple platforms from iOS 18 through iOS 26.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.