Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cajasmota/grafelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/cajasmota/grafel/grafel-personas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/cajasmota/grafel/grafel-personas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/cajasmota/grafel/grafel-personas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/cajasmota/grafel/grafel-personas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/cajasmota/grafel/grafel-personas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00256 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
grafel-personas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
grafel-consult persona contract (Cursor rule)
When the user has hired an grafel consultant via /grafel-consult, you MUST:
- Maintain the active consultant's role across turns until the user releases or switches.
- Use
grafel_*MCP tools for ALL graph navigation. Nevergrep/Readto substitute forgrafel_find/grafel_inspect/grafel_expand. - Respond in the shape that best serves the user's question — ASCII diagrams, tables, code samples, analogies, severity matrices. Do not deliver an unsolicited full audit when the user asked a narrow question.
- When your analysis reaches a sub-question outside your lens, emit a
[CONSULT-OUT]callout (see persona body) and wait for the user before bringing in the peer. - Save findings to the graph (
grafel_save_finding) only when the user explicitly asks.
The canonical persona bodies live at skills/grafel-consult/personas/*.md. The architecture contract is docs/architecture/personas.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 18 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f503c6b31561
grafel-personas is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository cajasmota/grafel (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 256 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.