code-review-standards

code-review-standards is a cursor rule for Cursor from carmentacollective/carmenta. It costs 4 tokens per session (547 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A set of code-review rules for judging whether automated review feedback applies to the code’s actual context.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when assessing bot-generated code-review comments and deciding which suggestions should be accepted or rejected.
Why use it?
It helps separate valid review findings from suggestions based on information a review bot does not have.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Use it when assessing bot-generated code-review comments and deciding which suggestions should be accepted or rejected.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carmentacollective/carmenta

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review-standards

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review-standards

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/carmentacollective/carmenta/code-review-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 4 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 547 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00004 $0.00547
Opus 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00219
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00001 $0.00109
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00055

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 7e18fe3bbe2e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/code-review-standards.mdc · 70 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 70 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 7e18fe3bbe2e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-standards is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository carmentacollective/carmenta (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 547 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

code-review-standards compared with cursor rules from other repositories

code-review-standards next to 6 cursor rules from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
code-review-standardscarmentacollective/carmentaCursor rule24mo agononeA4Cursor
clean-codeagentset-ai/agentsetCursor rule2.1k9d agoMITA322Cursor
grug-brained-dev_avoid-abstractionscolchuck-ai/ai-resource-managerCursor rule247mo agoGPL-3.0A224Cursor
ponytailDietrichGebert/ponytailCursor rule185k8d agoMITA604Cursor
angular-20angular/angularCursor rule101kyesterdayMITA0Cursor
dev-standardapache/supersetCursor rule75kyesterdayApache-2.0A1,147Cursor
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checksprisma/ormCursor rule48kyesterdayApache-2.0A0Cursor