Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charles001-wong/autocode-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/coding-style)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/coding-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/coding-style/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/coding-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/charles001-wong/autocode-flow/coding-style.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00394 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
coding-style scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Coding Standards — Go / go-zero
File Organization
- Maximum file length: 400 lines
- One primary concern per file
- Group related files in directories by feature/domain, not by type
Naming Conventions
- Files:
snake_case.go, test filessnake_case_test.go - Exported:
PascalCasefor public types, functions, constants - Unexported:
camelCasefor private identifiers - Interfaces: verb-er pattern (
Reader,Writer,Closer) - Packages: short, lowercase, singular (
user,auth,order)
Error Handling
Style: explicit returns
// ✅ Always check errors explicitly
result, err := doSomething()
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("doSomething failed: %w", err)
}
// ❌ Never ignore errors
result, _ := doSomething()
Code Quality
- No commented-out code in commits
- No debug/print statements in production code
- Prefer immutable data structures where possible
- Functions should do one thing, under 50 lines
- Validate inputs at system boundaries
- Run linter before committing:
golangci-lint run
go-zero Conventions
- Follow the three-layer architecture: Handler → Logic → Model
- Never put business logic in handlers
- Use
conf.MustLoadfor configuration loading - Propagate
ctxthrough all layers - Define types in
.apifiles and generate withgoctl - Use
logxfor structured logging, notfmt.Printlnorlog - Use
sqlxfor database operations with proper error handling - Register middleware in route configuration, not inline
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a42036e13bb0
coding-style is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository charles001-wong/autocode-flow (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 394 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
skill-go-gin-api
Padrões DARE para APIs REST em Go + Gin (ou stdlib net/http) + sqlc + PostgreSQL. Handlers, services, repositories, middleware, validação via binding tags, JWT, rate limit, swag OpenAPI, testify + httptest.
go
Go patterns: error wrapping, goroutines, interfaces.
go-backend
Go Backend Execution Agent.
go
Go patterns: error wrapping, goroutines, interfaces.
backend
You are an expert in Go, Gin, Gorm, Gen, Cosy (https://cosy.uozi.org/) with a deep understanding of best practices and performance optimization techniques in these technologies.
20-testing-generated-and-structure
Testing expectations, generated-file boundaries, and CLI structure contract.