Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/cmaranho/rn-agent-skills/code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cmaranho/rn-agent-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00157 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00078 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
- Mudança atende ao requisito e respeita o escopo declarado.
- Segue arquitetura, convenções e critérios de qualidade do projeto.
- Sem duplicação, código morto ou complexidade desnecessária.
- Tratamento de erros, estados de UI e casos de borda cobertos.
- Testes presentes, significativos e passando.
- Sem segredos,
any,console.logou dependências injustificadas. - Acessibilidade e performance consideradas na UI.
- Nomes claros; PR pequeno e coeso; histórico de commits legível.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 16 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A c93a1eb383ad
code-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository cmaranho/rn-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 157 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
app_rules
This document outlines the essential rules and guidelines for developing with the MobileLauncher LT boilerplate. Follow these rules to maintain consistency, scalability, and code quality across the project.
android-viewmodel
Android ViewModel conventions — StateFlow, repository abstraction, coroutines, no LiveData.
android_clean_architecture
Enforce clean architecture principles in Android projects.
android-networking-retrofit-okhttp
Build Android networking stacks with Retrofit, OkHttp, interceptors, API contracts, and resilient error handling.
swift-development
Swift development: SwiftUI, Combine, async/await, iOS patterns, and Apple platform conventions.
flutter_architecture_overview
High-level overview of the Flutter project architecture, directory structure, file naming conventions, and decision checklists. Use this to understand where code belongs.