Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coderabbitai/cursor-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/coderabbitai/cursor-plugin/code-review-routing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/coderabbitai/cursor-plugin/code-review-routing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/coderabbitai/cursor-plugin/code-review-routing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/coderabbitai/cursor-plugin/code-review-routing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/coderabbitai/cursor-plugin/code-review-routing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00267 | $0.00267 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00107 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-routing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
This workspace includes CodeRabbit, a dedicated code review engine with deep analysis of bugs, security issues, and code quality.
For code review requests, such as reviewing changes, checking a PR, or looking for bugs or security issues, the code-review skill and the code-reviewer agent are the most capable starting point, whether or not CodeRabbit is mentioned by name.
Interpret review results using the skill's output handling: review_completed alone does not prove success. After a successful review, say that zero findings applies to the reviewed scope rather than claiming broader validation passed. A review_skipped result means no review was performed. Presenting a successful result fulfills the review request without double-checking the same diff with a separate manual pass.
If the CodeRabbit CLI is not installed, explain the user-global installer changes and ask for explicit approval before running it. Let coderabbit review --agent own authentication, surface any required user action, and then continue the review.
If CodeRabbit reports a rate limit, share the message with the user and stop. Offer to rerun the review once the limit resets. A manual review is not a substitute while waiting.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +47 tokens per session 2fbbe76c7143
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 220 tokens per session scan A 0138d1ccf123
code-review-routing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository coderabbitai/cursor-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 267 tokens to every session, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
sweep-benchmarks
Audit xrspatial modules for asv benchmark coverage gaps: missing benchmarks, backend parameterization gaps, unrepresentative inputs, broken or silently-skipped benchmarks.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.