review-checklist

A code-review checklist for Compozy development. It covers tests, formatting, error handling, security, performance, and consistency with existing code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changes for missing tests, unsafe inputs, exposed secrets, weak error handling, inefficient code, and violations of project conventions.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers find common problems before code is accepted.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/compozy/gograph/review-checklist
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compozy/gograph

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 407 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 407 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00407 $0.00407
Opus 5 $0.00204 $0.00204
Sonnet 5 $0.00081 $0.00081
Haiku 4.5 $0.00041 $0.00041

Measured 2d ago against content hash c395f16d3dd6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/review-checklist.mdc · 60 lines

What it actually says

Code Review Checklist

Pre-Review Requirements

<pre_review_requirements> Before submitting code for review, ensure:

  • All tests pass and follow the established testing patterns
  • Code has been formatted with go fmt
  • All linter warnings have been addressed
  • Error handling follows project patterns
  • Security considerations have been addressed </pre_review_requirements>

Review Checklist

Common Issues to Watch For

<common_issues type="code_quality">

  • Missing error handling or inappropriate error propagation
  • Tests that don't follow the t.Run("Should...") pattern
  • Hardcoded values that should be configurable
  • Missing context propagation in functions that make external calls
  • Security vulnerabilities like exposed secrets or unvalidated inputs
  • Performance issues like unnecessary allocations or inefficient algorithms
  • Code that doesn't follow established project patterns
  • Missing or inadequate test coverage </common_issues>

Review Process

<review_process>

  • Focus on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to standards
  • Check for proper error handling and testing patterns
  • Verify security considerations have been addressed
  • Ensure code follows established project patterns and conventions
  • Look for opportunities to improve code clarity and efficiency </review_process>
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 60 lines · 407 tokens per session scan A c395f16d3dd6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-checklist is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository compozy/gograph (9 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 407 tokens to every session, about $0.0020 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.