Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Consiliency/Flutter-StructurizrWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/consiliency/flutter-structurizr/project-structure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/consiliency/flutter-structurizr/project-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/consiliency/flutter-structurizr/project-structure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/consiliency/flutter-structurizr/project-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/consiliency/flutter-structurizr/project-structure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00133 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
project-structure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Project Structure Guidelines
- Follow the clean architecture approach: domain, application, infrastructure, presentation layers.
- Keep all specs, implementation plans, and project status in the
specs/directory. - Do not duplicate status or user documentation in developer memory files (e.g., CLAUDE.md).
- Place all user-facing documentation in the README and specs.
- Use example/ for focused example apps and demo_app/ for the main demo application.
- Organize tests to mirror the lib/ structure for easy navigation and coverage.
- Clean up unused files and helpers after refactors.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 03a50698346f
project-structure is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Consiliency/Flutter-Structurizr (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 133 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).