Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cote-star/agent-chorus. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cote-star/agent-chorus/main/.cursorrulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cote-star/agent-chorusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/cote-star/agent-chorus/cursorrules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/cote-star/agent-chorus/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/cote-star/agent-chorus/cursorrules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/cote-star/agent-chorus/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/cote-star/agent-chorus/cursorrules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00074 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00030 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
cursorrules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cursorrules — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
What it actually says
- Read .agent-context/current/routes.json to identify task type
- Load contracts from .agent-context/current/completeness_contract.json + .agent-context/current/search_scope.json
- Search ONLY within scoped directories defined in search_scope.json
- Do not open repo source files before step 3
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A d6c094db351a
cursorrules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository cote-star/agent-chorus (15 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
stash
Stash CLI and user-scoped context.
project-spine-apps-web
Project Spine scoped guidance for "apps/web".
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.