Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/csoai-org/nis2-compliance-mcp/cursorrulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CSOAI-ORG/nis2-compliance-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/csoai-org/nis2-compliance-mcp/cursorrules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/csoai-org/nis2-compliance-mcp/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/csoai-org/nis2-compliance-mcp/cursorrules.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00199 | $0.00199 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00100 | $0.00100 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
cursorrules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
NIS2 Compliance MCP - Auto-trigger Rules
When the user asks about NIS2, Directive (EU) 2022/2555, network information security, essential/important entities, or cybersecurity directive compliance, use the nis2-compliance-mcp tools:
- check_nis2_compliance: Full NIS2 compliance assessment
- list_nis2_articles: Browse NIS2 articles and measures
- classify_entity: Determine if entity is essential or important
- check_article_21_measures: Assess against 10 prescribed security measures
- incident_reporting_check: NIS2 Article 23 reporting requirements
- sign_nis2_attestation: Cryptographically signed compliance certificate (Pro+)
Install: pip install nis2-compliance-mcp
NIS2 transposition deadline was October 18, 2024. National enforcement varies by member state. Germany deadline: March 2025.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 15 lines · 199 tokens per session scan A eac24fdc7685
cursorrules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository CSOAI-ORG/nis2-compliance-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 199 tokens to every session, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
When the user asks about Cyber Resilience Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, products with digital elements, CE marking for software, or vulnerability disclosure, use cra-compliance-mcp tools.
cursorrules
When the user asks about llm compliance comparison, use llm-compliance-comparison-mcp tools: compareproviders, recommendforusecase, providerriskprofile, compliancematrix, crosswalkproviders.
cursorrules
When the user asks about nist rmf, use nist-rmf-ai-mcp tools: assessriskprofile, mapaiimpact, generateriskcontrols, crosswalktoeuaiact, createriskreport.
cursorrules
When the user asks about DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act), ICT risk management, financial sector cybersecurity, third-party ICT risk, or Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, use the dora-compliance-mcp tools.
cursorrules
When the user asks about uk ai act, use uk-ai-act-mcp tools: classifyukrisk, checkaisialignment, compareeuuk, assessreadiness, generateimpactassessment.
cursorrules
When the user asks about contract review, use contract-review-ai-mcp tools: analyzecontract, extractclauses, identifyrisks, comparecontracts, summarizecontract.