Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/484-teradata)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/484-teradata"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/484-teradata.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00630 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
484-teradata scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Teradata Engineering Ruleset
Audience: engineers writing Teradata SQL for analytics and batch processing
Goal: predictable performance (spool + joins), safe change management, and explainable query plans
Planning and performance basics
- Always start from the data shape:
- expected row counts at each stage
- join cardinalities
- whether filters can be applied early
- Use
EXPLAIN(or plan tooling) on queries that will run at scale.
Primary Index and data distribution (PI)
- PI choice affects distribution and join performance.
- Avoid PI choices that cause skew (hot values).
- For large joins, align distribution keys where it materially reduces redistribution.
[!NOTE] PI strategy is workload-specific. Choose based on the dominant access patterns, not “what feels right”.
Statistics (collect stats intentionally)
- Collect statistics on:
- join keys
- highly selective predicates
- columns used in partitioning/range filters
- Re-collect stats after significant data volume shifts.
[!IMPORTANT] Bad/missing stats are a common root cause of unstable Teradata performance.
Spool safety
- Watch for operations that explode spool:
- many-to-many joins without pre-aggregation
- cross joins
- large intermediate sorts
- Prefer pre-filtering and pre-aggregation before joining large tables.
[!WARNING] Spool blowups are outages. If a query shape can blow up, make that risk explicit and mitigate it.
Teradata SQL idioms
QUALIFY (analytic filtering)
Use QUALIFY to filter analytic function results without extra subqueries:
SELECT
user_id,
event_ts,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY user_id ORDER BY event_ts DESC) AS rn
FROM events
QUALIFY rn = 1;
Change safety (DDL/DML)
Follow 475-sql.mdc destructive-operation guardrails:
- prove rowsets before
UPDATE/DELETE - use transactions when supported by your execution environment
- treat
DROP/TRUNCATEas high-risk operations with rollback plans
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 104 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 70d81abbd1d5
484-teradata is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook (16 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
as-contract-cast-smell
// ❌ WRONG — bypasses the family ContractSerializer seam const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract; const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract .
no-backward-compatibility
Do not add backward-compatibility shims or migration scaffolding.
postgresql
This guide defines the definitive best practices for writing clean, performant, and maintainable PostgreSQL SQL, focusing on modern conventions and avoiding common pitfalls.
query-optimization
A database performance rule that requires measuring PostgreSQL queries with EXPLAIN ANALYZE under the same user permissions and row-level security (RLS) conditions used in production.
ehs-ims-conventions
EHS IMS app — RBAC, data layer, tRPC, migrations, AI boundaries.