Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danfmaia/agent-teamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/danfmaia/agent-teams/cursorrules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/danfmaia/agent-teams/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/danfmaia/agent-teams/cursorrules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/danfmaia/agent-teams/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/danfmaia/agent-teams/cursorrules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.03600 | $0.03600 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.01440 | $0.01440 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00720 | $0.00720 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00360 | $0.00360 |
Grade A, and why
cursorrules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 369 lines · 3,600 tokens per session scan A 0b6a3563ef94
cursorrules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository danfmaia/agent-teams (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), with no licence file. It adds 3,600 tokens to every session, about $0.0144 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
heartbeat-execution-boundaries
Keep heartbeat a clear lifecycle coordinator with cohesive modules, explicit execution authority, and safe resource ownership.
kandev-pr-fixup
Kandev PR fixup workflow prompt for Cursor agents.
language-agnostic-patterns
Language-agnostic programming patterns: SOLID, design patterns, clean code, and architecture. Load when refactoring, designing abstractions, or reviewing structure — not for everyday syntax.
cursor-tools-mastery
Cursor 3.7 runtime guide: choose the right tool, canvases, Design Mode, /worktree, /best-of-n, Await, and parallel execution where safe.
cursor-agent-orchestration
Cursor 3.7 orchestration guide: when to plan, when to delegate, nested subagents, multi-environment handoffs, /best-of-n, and Await for long-running branches.
fable5-reasoning
Fable 5 reasoning protocols: task interpretation, risk-first decomposition, approach selection, interleaved thinking, hypothesis ledgers, premortems, calibration, and the stuck-strategy ladder. Load for complex, ambiguous, or long-horizon tasks, for debugging strategy, or whenever progress stalls.