Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/David405/harness-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/david405/harness-kit/post-execute-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/david405/harness-kit/post-execute-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/david405/harness-kit/post-execute-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/david405/harness-kit/post-execute-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/david405/harness-kit/post-execute-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00317 | $0.00317 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00127 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
post-execute-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Post-execute review
After a sprint contract is executed and VERIFY is green, run a harness review before staging product files or telling the human the work is complete.
Required order
CONTRACT (approved) → EXECUTE → VERIFY → REVIEW → stage → stop
- VERIFY — run the contract's verify commands; all must pass (or document skips with reason).
- REVIEW — read
harness-reviewskill +templates/REVIEW.md; grade against the contract. - Report — deliver the review summary to the human in chat (merge recommendation, findings). Do not paste harness review or contract compliance into the GitHub PR body.
- Stage — stage product files; set
FEATURES.jsontoPENDING_REVIEWif not already. - Stop — do not commit, push, or open a PR unless explicitly asked.
Not a substitute for human PASS
The executor runs review and sets PENDING_REVIEW. PASS is human-only after they approve merge.
When review can be skipped
- Trivial one-line fixes with no contract (if
AGENTS.mdallows condensed work) - Human explicitly says "skip review" for this session
Otherwise: no staging, no "done" message without review.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 317 tokens per session scan A 67608cc8e6c8
post-execute-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository David405/harness-kit (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 317 tokens to every session, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
sweep-benchmarks
Audit xrspatial modules for asv benchmark coverage gaps: missing benchmarks, backend parameterization gaps, unrepresentative inputs, broken or silently-skipped benchmarks.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.