Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevEngageLab/engagelab-sms-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/devengagelab/engagelab-sms-mcp/mcp-server-development-standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/devengagelab/engagelab-sms-mcp/mcp-server-development-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/devengagelab/engagelab-sms-mcp/mcp-server-development-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/devengagelab/engagelab-sms-mcp/mcp-server-development-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/devengagelab/engagelab-sms-mcp/mcp-server-development-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00429 | $0.00429 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00215 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-server-development-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MCP Server Development Standards
Apply these rules to all MCP server work in this repository.
Core Rules
- Build tools with explicit input schemas (
zod) and clear output shapes. - Keep tool names, descriptions, and argument fields stable and backward compatible.
- Return actionable errors: explain what failed, why, and how to recover.
- Never hardcode secrets; read credentials from environment variables.
- Add timeout, retry, and graceful failure handling for external API calls.
- Keep side effects explicit; avoid hidden writes, deletions, or irreversible actions.
- Validate and sanitize any user-provided or remote data before use.
- Log enough context for debugging, but never log secrets or sensitive payloads.
TypeScript Standards
- Use TypeScript for all runtime and server code; do not introduce plain
.jssource files. - Keep strict typing on (
strict: true) and avoidany; preferunknownplus narrowing. - In
catchblocks, narrowerrorsafely before reading message/details. - Add explicit types for exported APIs and shared helper boundaries.
- Prefer
import typefor type-only imports to keep runtime output clean.
Implementation Pattern (TypeScript)
// ❌ BAD: no schema, weak error context
server.tool("sendSms", async (args) => provider.send(args));
// ✅ GOOD: schema + safe error mapping
server.tool(
"send_sms",
"Send an SMS through EngageLab",
{ phone: z.string().min(6), content: z.string().min(1).max(500) },
async ({ phone, content }) => {
try {
return await provider.send({ phone, content });
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`send_sms failed: provider request was rejected`);
}
}
);
Quality Gate
- For every new tool, include one success path test and one failure path test.
- Keep
name/versionmetadata accurate when behavior changes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 54 lines · 429 tokens per session scan A 637076298e8b
mcp-server-development-standards is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository DevEngageLab/engagelab-sms-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 429 tokens to every session, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
tools
MCP tool development patterns — factory pattern, base class, callbacks, and descriptions.
new-tool-from-docs
This rule generates tool implementations for the Razorpay MCP server based on API documentation.
php-client-implementation
Guidelines for implementing MCP clients in PHP.
php-server-implementation
Guidelines for implementing MCP servers in PHP.
301-framework-spring-boot
Spring Boot development guidelines.
mcp-development
Cursor rule "mcp-development" from floriscornel/todo-mcp, covering mcp development patterns, tool definition structure, error handling patterns, tool naming conventions and response formatting.