Varlock is a configuration system for environment-variable files that gives coding agents schemas and validation rules without revealing secret values. Developers use it to manage, validate, load, and protect application configuration across environments.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dmno-dev/varlockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/dmno-dev/varlock/env-graph-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/dmno-dev/varlock/env-graph-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/dmno-dev/varlock/env-graph-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/dmno-dev/varlock/env-graph-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/dmno-dev/varlock/env-graph-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00408 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00163 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
env-graph-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Rule: General Test Structure for env-graph
Description
All tests in the env-graph package must follow best practices for maintainability, clarity, and extensibility. This includes using DRY setup, table-driven tests where appropriate, and clear assertion of expected behavior.
Rationale
- Ensures tests are easy to read, extend, and maintain.
- Reduces code duplication and encourages consistent patterns across the codebase.
- Makes it easier to add new test cases and spot regressions.
Requirements
- Use a single setup function or helper for repeated test logic (e.g., graph setup, data source creation).
- Prefer table-driven tests (array of test case objects) for scenarios with multiple similar cases.
- Each test case object should include a label/description and all relevant input/expected output fields.
- Use
describe()andit()blocks to organize tests by feature or function. - Assertions must clearly check the expected behavior (e.g., resolved values, errors, config keys, etc.).
- Avoid copy-pasting similar
it()blocks; use iteration over test cases where possible. - Use meaningful variable names and keep test logic concise.
Example
function featureTests(
tests: Array<{
label: string;
input: string;
expected: any;
}>,
) {
return () => {
tests.forEach(({ label, input, expected }) => {
it(label, async () => {
// ...setup and assertions...
});
});
};
}
describe('some feature', featureTests([
// ...test cases...
]));
Enforcement
- All new and modified tests in env-graph must follow these guidelines.
- Reviewers should request changes if tests are not DRY, table-driven (where appropriate), or lack clear assertions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4210e0425acc
env-graph-tests is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository dmno-dev/varlock (4,708 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 408 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
python_dev
Cursor rule "python_dev" from thisismygitrepo/machineconfig, covering python development environment and tooling, python coding rules, general programming ethos and privacy.
090-env-schema
090: Environment variable schema.
20-testing-generated-and-structure
Testing expectations, generated-file boundaries, and CLI structure contract.
fuzzing
Fuzzing setup and guidelines for skia-rs.
smoke-monkey-tester
Smoke tests for core functionality and monkey/chaos tests aiming to break the system with randomized inputs. / TR: Sistemin temel fonksiyonlarını kontrol eden smoke testler ve rastgele girdilerle sistemi çökertmeyi hedefleyen monkey/chaos testleri.
STAGE_S5_TEST_POINTS
A staged workflow for turning approved requirements into a complete list of test points. It checks required earlier documents and records any requirement that has no matching test point.