200-frontend

200-frontend is a cursor rule for Cursor from dpaluy/rails-ai-rules. It costs 964 tokens per session, scanned A, original, no licence file.

A set of coding rules for Rails frontend work, covering file structure, CSS organization, components, Stimulus, and design principles. Rails is a web framework, and Stimulus is a JavaScript framework for adding behavior to web pages.

In plain words
What is it for?
Planning frontend files, organizing CSS, structuring components and Stimulus code, and applying the stated design rules.
Why use it?
It gives the agent shared guidance for organizing and designing frontend code in a Rails project.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/dpaluy/rails-ai-rules/200-frontend
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dpaluy/rails-ai-rules

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 200-frontend

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/dpaluy/rails-ai-rules/200-frontend.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/dpaluy/rails-ai-rules/200-frontend)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/dpaluy/rails-ai-rules/200-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/dpaluy/rails-ai-rules/200-frontend.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 964 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 964 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00964 $0.00964
Opus 5 $0.00482 $0.00482
Sonnet 5 $0.00193 $0.00193
Haiku 4.5 $0.00096 $0.00096

Measured 5d ago against content hash 25802afccbdf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

200-frontend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/200-frontend.mdc · 96 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 96 lines · 964 tokens per session scan A 25802afccbdf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

200-frontend is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository dpaluy/rails-ai-rules (7 stars, last pushed 1y ago), with no licence file. It adds 964 tokens to every session, about $0.0048 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.